Orbits
  • πŸ’»Overview
  • 🎯Background and market analysis
    • Background
    • Market Analysis
  • Competitive advantage
  • πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’ΌBusiness Model
    • To C
    • To B
    • Profit Model
  • πŸ“²Technology
    • Security and usability comparison
    • Shard chain
    • Transaction types
    • Rollup data restore
    • Security models
  • πŸ§‘β€πŸ«Team
  • 🌊Liquidity profits
  • πŸš”Roadmap
  • πŸ‘―Partnership
  • ⛓️Links
    • Twitter
    • Discord
    • Telegram
    • Medium
    • Whitepaper
    • Website
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Background and market analysis

Background

  • Seldom dexes are as functional as cexes in regards to fees, efficiency, user font and so on.

  • Few dexes accept fiat deposits (credit card access).

  • Suspected β€œefficient” money use and possible financial regulations make Cexes vulnerable towards crisis.

  • A cheaper transaction fee (like cexes) incoporated dex is demanded.

  • AMM create significant impermanent loss.

  • No unified platform that aggregates data across the major exchanges and quotes the combined order book at the best price.

PreviousBackground and market analysisNextMarket Analysis

Last updated 2 years ago

🎯